Now for more Google which says the atomic mass of iron is 55 g (ie. 1 mole of iron atoms weigh 55g), oxygen is 16g, silicon is 28g and magnesium 24g.
Do you know what a mole is I wonder – it’s just a definition of a weighable amount of atoms. 1 mole of atoms is 6×10^23 atoms.
2×10^24 kg of iron, or 4×10^25 moles (mass/mass of a mole) or 2×10^49 atoms of iron
2×10^24 kg of oxygen, or 1×10^26 moles, or 6×10^49 atoms of oxygen
1×10^24 kg of silicon, or 2×10^49 atoms
1×10^24 kg of magnesium, or 2×10^49 atoms.
Add it together and it’s 1×10^50 atoms by my estimate. That’s
Leila – I think compared to the planet all the plants and animals on the surface would hold a negligible amount of atoms – be interesting to estimate that too….
Surely all the living things are made up of carbon etc. originally taken from the Earth (or is that opening a whole new can of worms?!) so they wouldn’t make too much difference?
It’s interesting that both are estimates are only out by (I think) an order of magnitude! I wonder what would happen if you took the fact that most of the atoms aren’t in atomic form into account? I assume the molecular binding energies are very small, but with that number of atoms it could make a difference to the total mass!
I couldn’t be bothered to count all the zeros in your answer Adam! I guess there’s a reason for the use of scientific notation. Still it’s fun to write them out long hand sometimes.
Order of magnitude I doubt it’d change much because of molecular binding energy. I could be wrong there though.
Comments
Karen commented on :
Leila – I think compared to the planet all the plants and animals on the surface would hold a negligible amount of atoms – be interesting to estimate that too….
Adam commented on :
Surely all the living things are made up of carbon etc. originally taken from the Earth (or is that opening a whole new can of worms?!) so they wouldn’t make too much difference?
It’s interesting that both are estimates are only out by (I think) an order of magnitude! I wonder what would happen if you took the fact that most of the atoms aren’t in atomic form into account? I assume the molecular binding energies are very small, but with that number of atoms it could make a difference to the total mass!
Karen commented on :
I couldn’t be bothered to count all the zeros in your answer Adam! I guess there’s a reason for the use of scientific notation. Still it’s fun to write them out long hand sometimes.
Order of magnitude I doubt it’d change much because of molecular binding energy. I could be wrong there though.
Adam commented on :
10^23 atoms/gram x 10^24 grams -> 10^50atoms
BAM. Science.
Adam commented on :
I reckon molecular bonding would be a decimal point at about 10^10atoms so not significant on an order of magnitude, but not small!
(Apparently mass of a proton ~10^7 times chemical binding energy.)