-
Question: I have been reading about Supernova 1987a. I found it a bit mysterious that no neutron star has been found, as a neutron star was meant to be found, considering it was a core-collapse supernova. Do you know why this is? I find this very interesting and mysterious, do you? From balletshoe1998 From Howell's School Llandaff
- Keywords:
Comments
balletshoes1998 commented on :
Thanks! That’s a lot clearer for me now 🙂
Karen commented on :
So I just asked my husband about this and he didn’t seem too concerned. He said, basically like I did, that it might just be too soon to see any evidence of the neutron star emerging from the supernova. Also it wouldn’t be too much of a surprise if this supernova made a black hole instead of a neutron star as constrains on the mass of the star which exploded leave room for that.
One thing I got wrong though – the neutrinos don’t definitively prove a neutron star was made – they are produced in the explosion itself, so would still be there if it made a black hole instead.
balletshoes1998 commented on :
Thanks 🙂 I think I understand that now 😀
balletshoes1998 commented on :
Thanks Leila